SHAMSHERA: An unbelievably horrendous film!

By

Sharada Iyer

What a waste of time, talent and resources by Yash Raj films, producer Aditya Chopra and director Karan Malhotra-they promised a magnum opus and delivered a total dud! But then, after seeing the trailer it should not come as a surprise, for the recipe for disaster was there for everyone to see in the trailer itself, and explains the dismal performance of the film in the cinema halls. Many morning shows have been cancelled and many other shows have recorded very poor occupancy rates. The show I went for on 22nd July, Friday- 4pm, had only eight people in the cinema hall which is definitely an indication that senseless hype alone is not enough to bring in the audience.

Nowadays, the publicity of any big-budget film begins almost two years in advance and in a bid to attract attention, everything about the film is overhyped and they end up revealing every detail in the trailer leaving no surprise element in terms of story and song picturization. The trailer itself is like a mini movie and maybe many viewers prefer to stay away and wait for its OTT release and not take the trouble to go to cinema halls.

Ranbir Kapoor, whose film is coming after a gap of four years, gets to play a double role for the first time, that of a father and son. Much was expected from this talented actor. However, that is not the case. Though he acts well, he does not add any zing to the characters and has not made any attempt to give any distinct identity to both the roles. Further, the two Ranbirs don’t get to share screen space because the son appears only after the father dies leaving no scope for any scenes of either confrontation or camaraderie.

The story of the film is set in the year 1871 in a fictious city of Kaza and it is about the people of a fictional tribe, called Khameran, and their oppression and sufferings not only at the hands of the British but also the Indians who worked for the British. Added to that was a ‘caste’ angle as the Khamerans belonged to the lower caste, the Hindu upper caste were more against them than the British also. Which brings us to the so-called deadly villain, Inspector Shuddhi Singh, played by Sanjay Dutt. He gets a vicious pleasure in torturing the Khamerans and loves working for the British.

The Khamerans become dacoits and start looting the upper caste of the society and the latter in turn appeal to the British to capture them and get back the looted treasure. With the help of Sanjay Dutt, the British capture them and keep them locked in a walled fortress and now these people have not only lost their freedom but are also subjected to extreme torture. Their leader ‘Shamshera’, fails in his plan to free them and is killed and they have to wait for 25 years before Shamshera’s son ‘Balli’ succeeds in freeing his tribe.

Though there is no novelty in this plot, yet the story could have been turned into a thrilling entertainer had the writers concentrated on an engaging screenplay with a taut narrative. But unfortunately, the screenplay is linear, there are no surprising twists, no extraordinary fight sequences, no visually spectacular scenes, and even the romantic track is quite pathetic. With the result, after the first few minutes into the film, the viewer knows exactly what to expect in the next two and a half hours.

Ranbir in the father role should have been given a lot more screen time -maybe the entire first half-as his character seemed a little more intense but he is killed off in a hurried manner and the son Ranbir enters too early. With the entry of the son, the screenplay becomes very slow and loses the grip for a long time. Surprisingly there seemed to be no youngsters of his age in the tribe, and he is shown playing the fool with small children which didn’t make much sense.

When every other person is tortured and made to work Ranbir somehow gets away singing and dancing and also escapes getting caught. Added to this, why he is kept in the dark about his father’s sacrifice is not explained. Ronit Roy in the role of Shamshera’s trusted friend could have been a great character but again he had a very small role and could hardly leave an impact. Similarly, Saurabh Shukla also looked a misfit in his role.

Such a story would have maybe found an audience in the 1950s when films on lower caste and upper caste would have worked but today this done-to-death plot of oppression by the British was too boring to watch from the first scene to the last. The running time of 2 hours and 38 minutes was quite harrowing as many scenes could have easily been edited out. The torture scenes inflicted on the poor people just don’t connect with the viewer and hence the heroic struggle of the father and son had no impact on our emotions. By the time the first half ended, it seemed like an eternity and the second half dragged even more.

Sanjay Dutt as the villain sports ‘vibhudi’ and a red ‘tilak’ and keeps shouting and frankly looks more like a mentally deranged and comical character rather than the evil oppressor he is supposed to portray. There is no menace in his body language or expressions. He is also not shown to age with the passage of time. (We do so miss our super villains like Amrish Puri and Pran!)

Vaani Kapoor has not been given a good role. She is a talented actress capable of much more as seen in her films Chandigarh Kare Aashiqui and Befikre, but she is just used as a glam doll who has to dance. The romance between the lead pair seems contrived and is forcibly incorporated in the story and does not do much for the film.

The 10-minute commentary with some painted visuals in the beginning of the film to narrate the background story was also not very appealing. Some scenes in the film did not even look like they belonged to the era in which the story is set. The climax fight scene was too long-drawn and Sanjay Dutt with his huge physique and brute strength was just not ready to give up.

Why do a flock of crows appear every now and then to help Ranbir remained a mystery! Towards the end there is a fight scene against the British army and in the ensuing chaos, a pregnant Vaani manages to hide inside a tree trunk and lo and behold! even manages to gives birth to her child inside the tree trunk without any problem… This scene is so ridiculous, one wonders how did the writers come up with this one?

Surprisingly, music is a plus point and the songs are quite catchy but the songs are really not essential to the plot and only end up dragging the narrative further. But for a few minutes, they do come as a breather in the otherwise lame proceedings.

In the four years that Ranbir was away from the big screen, a lot of talented actors have arrived on the scene and there is so much talent on OTT platforms where actors are exploring all kinds of new and refreshing characters. He should choose his roles wisely in future otherwise he will lag behind. Shamshera has been a huge disappointment and he needs to introspect. Incidentally the film was simultaneously released in Tamil and Telugu languages as well.

All eyes are now on his much-touted Brahmastra: Part I Shiva where he plays the main protagonist. As with Shamshera, the trailer has given away the entire story and the main song has been released on You Tube and been viewed many times. What fate awaits this epic film remains to be seen…

Bollywood Star-Pairs who played ‘Siblings’ as well as ‘Lovers’

By

Sharada  Iyer

Only a few actors and actresses either get the opportunity or have the guts to be cast alongside each other in different roles which allow them to explore their versatility beyond their romantic image.

Take the case of Sanjeev Kumar and Jaya Bhaduri. In Koshish they played husband and wife, in Sholay they were father-in-law and daughter-in-law, in Parichay they were father and daughter and in the unusual film Naya Din Nayi Raat, one Jaya Bhaduri meets nine Sanjeev Kumars and hence there are nine types of interactions. Likewise Amitabh Bachchan played father to Aishwarya Rai in Mohabbatein, was her elder brother in Hum Kisise Kum Nahin and also does an item number with her in Bunty aur Babli. We also had Raakhee playing Amitabh’s lover in Kabhi Kabhie and his mother in Shakti. Similarly Shammi Kapoor was Saira Banu’s lover in Junglee but became her father in Zameer.

This blog-post takes a look at those Bollywood star-pairs who can boast of the unique distinction of having played siblings in one film and effortlessly slipped into the role of lovers in other films…

-Dev Anand & Zeenat Aman

This pair is perhaps the most famous of the star-pairs in this category. Though Zeenat Aman made her debut in a small role in O P Ralhan’s Hulchul, it was Dev Anand’s Hare Rama Hare Krishna which established her as an ‘A’-grade star and there was no looking back after that for her. Ironically they were cast as siblings in the film as the whole film revolved around the estranged emotional relationship of the brother and sister. 

Later in her career she went on to do many films opposite him as a romantic pair also.

 

-Priyanka Chopra & Ranveer Singh

ddd

Last year this popular star-pair was in the news for two of their hit films- Dil Dhadakne Do and Bajirao Mastani. In the former film Priyanka Chopra played Ranveer’s elder sister and their sibling chemistry was one of the highlights of the film. Anil Kapoor and Shefali Shah played their parents in the film which explored the relationships in a rich but dysfunctional Punjabi family. While Rahul Bose played her husband, Anushka Sharma formed Ranveer’s love-interest.

Later in December 2015, she donned the character of Kashibai , first wife of  Peshwa Bajirao played by Ranveer in the super-hit film Bajirao Mastani. In 2014, she had already played his lover in the film Gunday.

 

 -Shah Rukh Khan & Aishwarya Rai

In 2000 they came together for the first time in Josh, where Shah Rukh Khan is the leader of a local gang in Goa and Aishwarya who plays his twin sister falls in love with  a boy from the rival gang-Chandrachur Singh. 

Later in the same year they come as lovers in Yash Raj Films’s Mohabbatein.  After this they were seen in Sanjay Leela Bhansali’s Devdas. In 2002, they also came together for an item number in the film Shakti-The Power starring Karisma Kapoor and Nana Patekar. The film produced by Sridevi had Shah Rukh in a special appearance and Aishwarya only for this song.

 

-Deepika Padukone  & John Abraham

In the 2011 comedy drama Desi Boyz, Deepika Padukone was cast opposite John Abraham while Chitrangada was paired opposite Akshay Kumar. The film showed the two heroes becoming male escorts to earn money for the company ‘Desi Boyz’ fulfilling the fantasies of ladies…

In 2013, the glamorous pair was cast as siblings in Race 2 . John played an ex-street fighter and billionaire gangster and Deepika as his step-sister was a 50% shareholder in all the stakes involved. The two shared an interesting love-hate relation trying to outwit each other for money.

race2

 

-Deepika Padukone & Arjun Rampal

In her debut making super-hit film Om Shanti Om in 2007, Deepika Padukone played a double role. In her first birth, she is a superstar actress who secretly marries her producer Arjun Rampal and is pregnant with his child little knowing of his evil intentions and is ultimately killed by him under horrific circumstances. Director Farah Khan copied the idea of narrating the whole murder scenario in the form of a song sequence from Karz and the appearance of Deepika as a ghost in the end was copied from Madhumati

oso 1

In 2010 once again she teamed up with Arjun Rampal in Sajid Khan’s hit comedy Housefull, but this time as his younger sister and had Akshay Kumar as her love-interest.

housefull2

 

Abhishek Bachchan & Asin

Bol Bachchan (2012) : In this Rohit Shetty directed film Abhishek Bachchan plays a Muslim character but due to unexpected circumstances he is forced to hide his identity, change his name, pretend to be a Hindu and masquerade as another person which leads to lots of comic confusions and hilarious situations. Asin is his sister and paired opposite Ajay Devgn. The film was inspired by Hrishikesh Mukherjee’s classic comedy Golmaal (1979).

Bol-Bachchan-poster

 The year 2015 saw the pair cast as lovers in the Umesh Shukla directed family drama All is Well where Rishi Kapoor plays Abhishek’s dad. However due to the uninteresting storyline,the film was a super-flop.

 

 -Amitabh Bachchan & Supriya Pathak

Shahenshah (1988) – In this film, written and directed by Tinnu Anand, Amitabh Bachchan maintains a  dual  image that of a corrupt cop by day and a secret protector punishing the evil-doers at night. Supriya Pathak plays his younger sister and Meenakshi Sheshadri is cast opposite him.

Sarkar -In this 2005 crime drama directed and produced by Ram Gopal Verma, Amitabh Bachchan played the main protagonist who runs his own law and order system and Supriya Pathak played his wife. In the years following the earlier film, Supriya Pathak ended up putting on so much weight, that she fit into the role of his wife with remarkable ease.

 

-Tusshar Kapoor & Kareena Kapoor

Jeetendra’s son Tusshar Kapoor made his debut in 2001 with the film Mujhe Kuch Kehna Hai opposite Kareena Kapoor. The film became a surprise hit of the year and had excellent music.While Kareena was her usual charismatic confident self, Tusshar also managed to give a decent performance.

However a successful debut did not help Tusshar’s career which nose-dived because of bad films and average performances and in 2010, he got to team up with Kareena but this time as her mute brother in Rohit Shetty’s comedy film Golmaal 3.

golmaal3_1

 

-Jackie Shroff & Madhuri Dixit

In 1989, Jackie Shroff and Madhuri Dixit teamed up as brother-sister duo in Rajiv Rai’s blockbuster Tridev, while Sunny Deol was her romantic interest. This film had the very popular chartbuster song ‘Oye Oye…’

In 1992, S Vishwanath directed a beautiful film Sangeet which had Madhuri Dixit in double role- that of an older woman and a young blind girl. Jackie Shroff falls in love with the blind Madhuri. She looked stunning in the film.

 

-Amitabh Bachchan & Hema Malini

They have played lovers in films like Desh Premee, Naseeb, Satte Pe Satta and Baaghban.

But in 1973, in the early part of his career, there was a film Gehri Chaal in which Amitabh played Hema Malini’s elder brother and Jeetendra played her romantic interest.

gehri chaal

 

-Akshay Kumar & Juhi Chawla

The 1997 comedy film Mr and Mrs Khiladi directed by David Dhawan featured this pair as lovers.

Four years later in 2001 director Suneel Darshan made a family drama –‘Ek Rishta-The Bond Of Love’, featuring Amitabh Bachchan and Raakhee as parents with three daughters and a son. Akshay Kumar and Juhi Chawla are cast as siblings with Karishma Kapoor as Akshay’s heroine.

Ek-Rishtaa-The-Bond-of-Love-2001-500x500

 

Salman Khan & Neelam Kothari

In 1992, they were paired opposite each other in the romantic film Ek Ladka Ek Ladki… 

Ek Ladka Ek Ladki
Ek Ladka Ek Ladki

Seven years down the line  in 1999,they were cast as siblings as part of a big family  in Sooraj Bharjatya’s multi-starrer Hum Saath Saath Hain. Neelam is shown to have three brothers- Mohnish Bahl, Saif Khan and Salman Khan

 

-Sunjay Dutt & Raveena Tandon

 

This pair has starred opposite each other in films like Aatish, Jeena Marna Tere Sang, etc.,

However in 1993, there came a multi-starrer Kshatriya directed by J P Dutta which revolved around feuds and killings between two warring Rajput families in which they end up as cousins.

 

 

-Sunny Deol & Urmila Matondkar

In 1987 came an action drama Dacait based on the dacoits of Chambal area. Violent circumstances in the village lead to Sunny Deol’s family being destroyed by zamindar which force him to become a dacoit to take revenge. Urmila Matondkar plays his younger sister in the film.

In 1999, when Sunny Deol directed his first film Dillagi starring himself and his real brother Bobby Deol, he cast Urmila as his heroine and his maiden attempt at direction found appreciation.

 

Juhi Chawla & Sanjay Suri

 

In the 2003 musical comedy Jhankar Beats directed by Sujoy Ghosh, Sanjay Suri and Juhi Chawla play husband and wife. The movie which deals with love friendship and music also starred Rahul Bose Shayan Munshi, Rinke Khanna and Riya Sen and was supposed to be a tribute to R D Burman.

In 2005 came a well scripted film, My Brother Nikhil, which dealt with the topic of AIDS and gay relationships in a very sensitive way. It was the first mainstream film to deal with homosexuality as major part of the story-line and received rave reviews everywhere. Sanjay Suri is in a relationship with Purab Kohli and Juhi Chawla plays his elder sister. When he contracts AIDS he is abandoned by all except these two who stand by him throughout.

Here are some star-pairs from our older lot of stars:

Dharmendra & Meena Kumari

They made a hit romantic pair in super-hit films like Phool aur Patthar, Purnima, Majhli Didi, Chandan Ka Palna, etc.  It was in 1964 that they came together for the first time in the AVM Production ‘Main Bhi Ladki Hoon’.

However the very next year in 1965 they played brother and sister in the film Kaajal where Dharmendra is paired opposite Padmini and Meena Kumari is paired opposite Raj Kumar. In the film, initially Dharmendra is Meena Kumari’s brother’s best friend but towards end it is revealed that due to mix-up of children at a very young age, Dharmendra was indeed her real brother… 

kaajal1

 

-Jagdeep & Nanda

In the 1957 family drama Bhabhi, Jagdeep plays the youngest son of Balraj Sahni and falls in love with a young Nanda who plays a young girl widowed in her childhood. The film is a typical family drama replete with all the ingredients like misunderstanding, sacrifice, wrong allegations, an evil brother,etc., and boasts of some wonderful performances especially from Balraj Sahni, Shyama and Jagdeep.

Two years later, AVM Productions who had earlier produced Bhabhi, signed the pair to play siblings in another family drama titled Barkha. This time Jagdeep has a full-length role and gets to play the main protagonist trying to protect his younger sister Nanda. Both come up with an excellent performance.

 

 Rajendra Kumar & Mumtaz

In 1963, the film Gehra Daag had Mumtaz playing Rajendra Kumar’s younger sister while Mala Sinha was paired opposite him. It was O P Ralhan’s first film as a director.

In 1972 the duo came together in Taangewaala, produced and directed by Rajendra Kumar’s brother Narendra Kumar. This is a highly forgettable film in RK’s career with a meaningless plot, inane screenplay and dull songs by Naushad.

 

-Dev Anand & Nanda

Kala Bazaar– a film from the house of Navketan which had all three Anand brothers Chetan, Vijay and Dev acting in it. Dev Anand is involved in black-marketing of movie tickets and falls for Waheeda Rehman but discovers that she is already in love with Vijay Anand. Nanda plays his younger sister.

In 1961 came the last B&W film from Navketan –Hum Dono. It is the only film in which Dev Anand ever played a double role in his career and has Sadhna and Nanda as the two heroines cast opposite him. The film became a super-hit and was also a musical blockbuster and the songs composed by Jaidev remain fresh and evergreen even today.

 

-Dev Anand & Suchitra Sen

Sarhad (1960) is quite a weird film and is basically a love triangle starring Dev Anand, Suchitra Sen and Padmini. Dev Anand plays a wild, crude and morose forest officer and Padmini, one of the workers, is crazily in love with him. However when Suchitra  Sen arrives on the scene and tries to reform him with her love,  Padmini becomes jealous and possibly gets to play one of the most evil female characters ever seen on screen.

The same year, Dev Anand and Suchitra Sen came together in another film Bambai Ka Babu with an off-beat theme where they played brother-sister. Dev Anand is a thief and enters the house of a wealthy couple masquerading as their only son who had run away when he was very young. Luckily no one actually recognizes him which makes his entry very easy. However trouble brews when he falls in love with his ‘sister’ Suchitra Sen who unaware of all this treats him like her elder brother. But in the end he does accept her as his sister and even performs the ritual of sending her off in the ‘doli’ or ‘palenquin’ after her marriage.

Here are two films where the star-pair play siblings in one film but in the other they share screen space with each other in only one seductive dance number…

Rajesh Khanna & Aruna Irani

In 1974, producer D Ramanaidu made Prem Nagar with Rajesh Khanna and Hema Malini. This film was a remake of his own Telugu film Prema Nagar (1971) and Tamil version Vasantha Maligai (1972). Incidentally all three versions were super-hits. In the film, the hero is shown to be a rich playboy always surrounded by girls. One such seductress in Prem Nagar happened to be Aruna Irani who had a ‘hot’ number picturized on her and Rajesh Khanna.

 

However in 1983 came Chetan Anand’s thrilling re-incarnation drama Kudrat in which the same pair are seen as brother and sister. Hema Malini and Priya Rajvansh form the love-interests of Rajesh Khanna.

 

Amitabh Bachchan & Aishwarya Rai

In the light-hearted film Hum Kisise Kum Nahin released in 2002, Amitabh plays a doctor who advises one of his patients Sunjay Dutt to get married to the girl he loves little knowing that it his own sister Aishwarya he is after. She in turn loves Ajay Devgn and the ensuing events form the crux of the film.

In 2005,  came the crime-comedy  Bunti aur Babli starring Abhishek Bachchan and Rani Mukherjee playing two lovable crooks. Amitabh Bachchan  has a supporting role and Aishwarya Rai is there only for the song ‘Kajra re…’. This song became a super-hit and till date remains one of the most popular item numbers ever picturised on screen.  Both Amitabh  and Abhishek get to shake a leg in this seductive number with Aishwarya. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

DOWN MEMORY LANE WITH YESTERYEAR STAR ‘SAIRA BANU’: A musical journey to celebrate her 72nd birthday

By

Sharada Iyer

Few actresses have had the blessing of turning into an overnight sensation with their very first film and Saira Banu was one of them. When this slim, graceful and breathtakingly beautiful 17-year old ‘Yahooed’ down the snowy slopes with Shammi Kapoor in Junglee in 1961, a new era of romance was ushered in the Hindi film industry and there was no looking back for her after that…

This blog-post takes a look at her career through some of her evergreen songs:

Junglee

Born on 23rd August, 1944, Saira Banu went on to become one of the most beautiful and glamorous actresses of our film industry and was an important part of the ‘Golden Era’ of our industry when super-hit music formed an essential component of our films. With the result she had the good fortune of having some outstanding songs picturized on her giving her films excellent recall value.

Junglee

She was a trendsetter as far as fashion was concerned. Her exquisite saris and classy jewellery pieces both designed by her mother Naseem Bano were a rage. She looked stunning in both Indian as well as western wear making everything she wore look elegant and classy.

Aayee Milan Ki Bela

naseem_banu_1946Her mother Naseem Bano had herself been a big star of the industry in the 30’s and 40’s and was renowned for her stunning looks. After the birth of her two children Saira Banu and Sultan Ahmed she and her husband parted ways and both Saira and Sultan were sent to Delhi initially and London later on for their education as she wanted them to grow up far away from the world of films.

Shagird

After Shammi Kapoor in  Junglee, she formed a hit pair with many heroes especially Rajendra Kumar, Joy Mukherjee, Biswajeet and later Dharmendra and had several hits with them.

Aadmi Aur Insaan

Jwar Bhata

She was the heroine of the all-time favourite comedy Padosan which had a long line of superb comic-actors like Mehmood, Kishore Kumar, Sunil Dutt, Mukri, Keshto Mukherjee, etc. Every song of the film was superb. Here I am including a song which is not played very often but is actually a masterpiece in every sense.

Padosan

She was an important part of Manoj Kumar’s super-hit classic Purab aur Pashchim where she brought to life the role of an Indian girl born and brought up in London and who had lost touch with her Indian roots, so beautifully that it is impossible to imagine that any other actress could have done justice to this role. She looked gorgeous in the blonde wig also.

Though she fell ill during the shooting and had to undergo treatment followed by several weeks of bed-rest, Manoj Kumar was willing to wait patiently for her to recover for he had written the role with only Saira Banu in mind and stated that if she was not able to play the role, then he would have to shelve the project.

She was only 8 years old in 1952 when she saw Mehboob Khan’s colourful extravaganza ‘Aan’ while studying in London. She felt an instant attraction to the hero of the film Dilip Kumar and kept writing letters to her mother to get as much information about him as possible…

Sagina

After completing her education she returned to India and soon engaged a tutor to learn to speak chaste Urdu only because Dilip Kumar spoke excellent Urdu. Her mother took her with her to the parties held at Mehboob Studios and soon many producers showed interest to cast her as their heroine. She was considered initially for Hum Hindustani as the second heroine but destiny had other plans for her and Junglee came her way.

Jhuk Gaya Aasman

Right from childhood she had nurtured only two dreams-that of becoming a film star like her mother and to marry the man of her dreams-Dilip Kumar and she accomplished both these feats due to her perseverance and faith in her abilities. Though she ultimately married him on 11th October,1966, she got to act with him only in 1970 in Gopi.

She made no bones about her love, admiration and respect for Dilip Kumar and kept begging her producers to cast them together. Ironically it was Dilip Saab who kept refusing on some pretext or the other. Initially she had even been considered for Ram aur Shyam but was rejected as Dilip Kumar felt that she was too young to act opposite him. He then gave mahurat shots for a few of her films like Saaz aur Awaaz. She looked lovely in the classical dances in the film. Here is a classical dance from Saira Banu.

Daaman aur Aag

She also got the opportunity to act opposite the other two giants of the B&W era -Dev Anand and Raj Kapoor before getting to act with Dilip Kumar…

Pyaar Mohabbat

Diwana

She also did some unique numbers which were bold for that time. For instance in Padosan and Jhuk Gaya Aasman she had songs picturized in a bath tub. To her credit never before or never after has any heroine looked so stunningly beautiful in such a song-sequence.

Jhuk Gaya Aasman

In Victoria No. 203, she sings a full song with the villain Ranjeet just draped in a towel

In both the songs, there was not an iota of vulgarity which speaks volumes about her demeanor and credit also goes to her directors for presenting her in a dignified manner.

In the same film she dresses up as a boy to find out some secret about her father and looks super smart in that get-up also…

Her song in Padosan on a cycle with all her friends also cycling remains an iconic song till date. Her hairstyle with the ribbon tied around her hair remains popular even today…

Incidentally she had been the first choice for both Guide and Jewel Thief and Vijay Anand had been very keen on casting her. But around the same time she had signed a film Habba Khatoon to be directed by Mehboob Khan with the possibility of Dilip Kumar being signed as the hero. Her dates clashed and she opted out of Guide in favour of getting an opportunity to work with Dilip Kumar who did give the clapper board for this also.

In Jewel Thief  Vijay Anand rewrote the script to increase her role but somehow the film never materialized. As luck would have it Habba Khatoon was shelved. But Saira has no regrets. In fact she is honest enough to confess that she could have never done justice to the role of ‘Rosie’ in Guide and felt glad that the role went to the right person who made it an immortal character.

Gopi

She had actually acquired the story of Sharmilee from writer Gulshan Nanda and given it to director Subodh Mukherjee and was keen to do the double role but when she fell very ill the producer went ahead and signed Raakhee for the role. She attended the premiere of Mughal-e-Azam all decked up in her mother’s heavy sari and high heels just to impress Dilip Kumar but unfortunately for her, Dilip Kumar never attended the premiere of this historic film as there was some unpleasantness between him and director K Asif over Asif’s marriage to Dilip Kumar’s sister. Years later, in 2004, she did get to attend the premiere of the coloured version of the film when it was re-released and this time she was standing next to Dilip Saab as his wife!

Here is a song from the film Aman (1967) in which she plays a Japanese woman who knows Hindi because she has been educated in India.

Towards the end of her career, she ended up acting with Shammi Kapoor, the hero of her first film as her father in Zameer where she was cast opposite Amitabh Bachchan…

Zameer

At 72, age may have caught up with her but her radiant spirit and charm still shine through and her undying love, admiration and respect for her Dilip Saab still continues which probably explains that special glow one can see on her face even today…

Shagird

Here’s wishing the elegant, graceful and beautiful actress birthday wishes from all her fans…

THE MAGIC OF ‘DEVDAS’ AND ITS UNWAVERING HOLD OVER INDIAN CINEMA

By

Sharada Iyer

Based on a story written by Sarat Chandra Chatterjee, ‘Devdas’ has been the subject of our films since the silent era and continues to enamour us even today. It has attracted film-makers of several languages in India as well as neighbouring Pakistan and Bangladesh and led them to attempt several remakes of this story over the past nine decades. The Wikipedia lists 17 versions of the film from 1928-2013. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Devdas). However there is also a Bhojpuri version which is missing from the list.

My first exposure to ‘Devdas’ was when as a kid I had watched the 1936 Hindi version of the film starring K L Saigal on television. Though I was too young to comprehend the story and the characters, what stayed with me in my mind subconsciously was the image of K L Saigal with his tousled hair holding a bottle, looking very sad and dejected and singing away his sorrows.

It is only when I watched a superb print of this film on YouTube recently that I understood the brilliance of the film and why it must have been a super-hit at the time of its release. I was completely bowled over by the superb direction, the technical brilliance, the unique story-line, the splendid performances and above all the lovely songs. But to enjoy the film in its entirety one must be able to transport oneself back in time to pre-independent India of 1930s and then sit back and see the magic unfold.

This blog-post is my humble effort towards understanding the enigma of ‘Devdas’- the story, ‘Devdas’-the landmark film of 1936 and above all ‘Devdas’-the extraordinary and enduring image of the hero who attained iconic status and changed the face of the film hero for years to come. ‘Devdas’ the disconsolate lover and protagonist of the film became a cultural icon for the youth of that time. The film continues to be a reference point for all our films and many scenes and concepts of our later films can be traced back to ‘Devdas’. For instance, from then on, it became a common practice in all films for our heroes to turn to alcohol to drown their sorrows.

THE AUTHOR

devdas novelSarat Chandra Chatterjee (Chattopadhyay) is said to have written the story around 1901 when he was about 25 years old but had to actually wait for 16 years to have it published in 1917!!! He wrote several short stories in Hindi and Bengali and many of these have been made into films but none came close to the success which ‘Devdas’ got. In a way the film was a big boost to the author’s career also otherwise he would have remained just another name in the list of the literature giants of our country who never really get the fame and appreciation which they deserve.

When one reads the story, it is remarkable to note that a young man like him had such a good grasp of the societal structure of those times existing in rural Bengal and an understanding of the nuances and intricacies of relationships considering the emotions he was able to weave into his characters!!!

To unravel the enigma of ‘Devdas’, it is imperative for us to start with a broad outline  of the story:

THE STORY…

-On the face of it, ‘Devdas’ is essentially a story of unrequited love which involves three principal characters- the hero Devdas, his childhood playmate and sweetheart Parvati and a prostitute Chandramukhi, who loses her heart to Devdas. He could never bring himself to love the latter and could never stop loving the former…

-Being a society steeped in tradition, the caste of the families played an important role. Devdas belonged to a family of wealthy landlords or ‘zamindars’ who were part of high caste ‘Brahmin’ society. Though Parvati was also a ‘Brahmin’ yet her family belonged to a lower caste where they took bride-price instead of giving dowry. (It is interesting to note that such families were considered ‘lower’ as against the families who practiced the ‘accepted’ custom of dowry!) For this primary reason Devdas’s parents were unwilling to accept the marriage of their son to Parvati even though they were very fond of her from the time she was a child.

-Smarting from the insult subjected to by Devdas’s father regarding the marriage proposal, Parvati’s father fixes her marriage to a rich but ageing  widower with children older than Parvati. 

-In spite of opposition from both sets of parents, Parvati comes to him in the middle of the night to confess her love for him and to tell him that she is ready to elope with him. But Devdas has neither the guts to go against his parents’ wishes nor does he wish to smear their reputation. He refuses to accept her, heads off to the city the very next morning and from there he writes a letter to her stating that he had always considered her as a friend and not as a lover.

-After writing this, he realizes his mistake and when he rushes back to her, it is too late as her marriage has been fixed to another and preparations are in full swing. He meets Parvati one last time before her marriage and asks her to reconsider her decision. But after being hurt by Devdas’s rejection earlier, Parvati rebukes him for his cowardly act and states that she does not mind the alliance chosen by her father and had willfully agreed to get married to the old man.

-Both their actions could be justified in keeping with the societal structure of that time; after all, for a son or daughter to go against his/her father’s wish was considered sacrilege in those times. In effect, owing to the societal conditions, parental pressure and Devdas’s indecisiveness, the two lovers are separated forever.

 

-Back in the city he is introduced to alcohol and a prostitute Chandramukhi by his loafer friend Chunnilal. Though Devdas loathes the very sight of her, he goes to her place regularly to drink and forget Parvati. But even in his drunken state, he never misbehaves with her and keeps his distance. This very quality of his character attracts Chandramukhi to him and she gives up her profession to be able to serve him unconditionally and if possible to rise in the eyes of Devdas. 

-In the story three important journeys happen simultaneously. When Parvati starts her new life by entering her husband’s house, Devdas starts his journey of descent by taking to alcohol and entering Chandramukhi’s place and inadvertently Chandramukhi’s journey of purification starts from the time she lays her eyes on Devdas.

-In her new home Parvati is loved and respected by her husband and his children and she in turn goes about her duties willingly and happily. On the first night itself, her husband tells her that an old man like him should not have married a young and beautiful girl like her. He feels she would have been much happier had she married someone youthful like her. He blesses her and their marriage turns out to be a celibate one where he treats her with utmost respect and dignity.

-So in effect the path is kept clear for the fire of the eternal love of Devdas and Parvati to keep burning and lends a touch of immortality to the lovers. Also the helplessness of all the three characters bound by their circumstances is brought out beautifully and makes the audience feel for them. This probably contributes in a major way to add to the enigma of the story and could be a major contributing factor for the cult status it has attained in our cinematic history…

dilip dev-Interestingly there is nothing ‘heroic’ about the hero of our story ‘Devdas’-  who is portrayed basically as a defeatist, is fickle-minded and impulsive in nature, faces the consequences of his actions and decisions by taking to alcohol to drown his sorrows and finally dies a dejected lover. Yet, in spite of his flawed character, our heart does go out to him when he embarks on his last painful journey in deteriorating health just to fulfil his promise made to Parvati to meet her before he dies but unfortunately dies near a tree outside her house without even catching a glimpse of her.

– In the last scene, when Parvati starts running to catch a glimpse of Devdas, the shackles of society once more close-in on her as orders are given by her husband to close the door thus denying her permission to step out and her wish remains unfulfilled. His death scene is thus a poignant one because abandoned and unrecognized by one and all he suffers a sorrowful death bereft of the dignity he deserved.

-Both his heroines though repressed by society, come across as strong positive characters who are lovable, have a lot of inspiring traits in them and in spite of their contrasting  personality are bound together by the common thread of their undying love for Devdas. Both fall for this man knowing his weaknesses and seem happy to share their journey of life with him for whatever little time they are destined. Bound by society’s rules and conventions they could never make him their own and in the end are left pining for him.

-All three are depicted as normal human characters who behave the way they do in the story because of the circumstances and the diktats of the societal structure prevalent in those times. Hence the essence of the story or characters can neither be fully understood nor discussed about in isolation of the rural setting of the Bengal of 1900s.

A FEW SIGNIFICANT ASPECTS…

naaz devdas

-Right from childhood the relationship between Devdas and Parvati is shown to be quite unique. As a child whenever he would get angry, he would hit her violently and yet she puts up with him because she liked to spend time with him when he was not in his foul mood. This violent nature may be the explanation behind his behaviour when years later he hits with a stick on her forehead and injures her a day before her marriage just to teach her a lesson for being arrogant and to give her a permanent scar which would always remind her of their unfulfilled love. She in turn accepts her wound without any misgivings.

(This kind of violence can be seen in the film Awara also where Raj Kapoor hits Nargis on the beach after she calls him ‘junglee’ and ‘awara’ and she does not utter a word  of protest. Here again they had been childhood playmates)

For that era, Parvati is shown to be a woman of extraordinary character who is both lovable and gutsy and there are many instances in the story where this trait of hers comes to fore. When she comes to his house in the middle of the night to declare her love for him and is ready to elope with him she is not bothered about the smear on her reputation that this can cause. The day before her marriage when she meets Devdas by the river bank she happily embraces him for one last time and  lies when her people ask her about the injury on her forehead. 

saigaldev-Later in the story, when Devdas’s father dies, she comes to meet him again in the middle of the night and pleads with him to give up drinking and to allow her to nurse him back to health. For a married woman to freely come and meet her lover like this must have been unheard of in those times. In the last scene when she comes to know that the man who had died in front of her house was none other than her Devdas, she starts running towards the main door not caring about her marital status, her position in the society or the fact that by running like this she had exposed her eternal love for Devdas. 

-Though Devdas loathes Chandramukhi’s very presence initially, much later in the story he does comes to respect her and is unable to understand her devotion for him much like he could not understand Parvati’s love for him. This not only shows his inherent inability to understand the feelings of the two women in his life but also perhaps reflects on his reluctance to acknowledge his own feelings for them.

A FEW QUESTIONS…

dilipdevdas

So what is it about this tragic tale of unrequited love that seems to have such a potent formula for our producers and directors to go back and dig out the script every once in a while?

Is the story accepted by every generation because basic traits like patriarchy, male dominance, chauvinism and female subjugation never changed and remain the same in society even today, almost a century later? Is it because even today in our society  caste, religion and language differences continue to cloud our thoughts when seeking marriage alliance and  parents continue to have the final say in the marriage of their children? After all, even today men do bow down to family pressure and women are asked to adjust or compromise in life in many sections of our society…

Is it the easy ‘relatability’ of the behaviour of the three characters which make them easy to identify with for the readers and viewers? Or is it the imperfection in their characters which makes them more humane and the story more open to interpretation and discussion thus making it a vibrant story which can be retold again and again?

There is something about the story which maybe cannot exactly be pin-pointed yet it engulfs us, makes us privy to the emotions of the characters, gets us involved in their inner turmoil and draws us into its enigmatic fold…

THE DIFFERENT VERSIONS

The first attempt at creating a celluloid version of the story was a silent film made in 1928 by Naresh Mitra after which the genius director Pramathesh Chandra Barua or P C Barua as he was more popularly known as accomplished the extraordinary feat of making three talkie versions in three languages in three consecutive years- Bengali in 1935, Hindi in 1936 and Assamese in 1937. Though he tasted extraordinary success with the Bengali film itself where he himself reprised the title role, the film became a national obsession only after the release of the Hindi version. Since then it has been made in Tamil, Telugu, Malayalam, Bhojpuri and Bengali languages as well by several accomplished directors.

barua devdas

 

Today most of the different versions of ‘Devdas’ are available online for us to see, compare and reflect upon…

Hindi (1955)

2002

2009

Telugu 1953

Tamil 1953

Bengali 2002

Bangladeshi 1982

Bhojpuri 2012

gulz-dev-It is rumoured that Gulzar had also wanted to make his version of ‘Devdas’ with Dharmendra, Hema Malini(Parvati)and Sharmila Tagore(Chandramukhi) !Wonder how that one would have turned out to be…

INTERESTING OBSERVATIONS…

-All the versions have met with box-office success irrespective of whether they followed the book to the T or made their own alterations. Actors who attempted to play the title role of ‘Devdas’ as well as the two female leads not only turned into celebrities and found overnight stardom but were also appreciated for their histrionic abilities. The film thus gave a great fillip to their careers.

-While the version with Saigal directly starts with a song where Devdas and Parvati are shown to be adults, the book starts with their childhood antics in exactly the same way as shown in Bimal Roy’s version. The dialogues of both these films were almost the same and both are heavily borrowed from the book. Bimal Roy had been the cinematographer for the Saigal’s version made twenty years earlier.

-The actor who plays the step-son of Parvati in the 1936 Hindi version has an uncanny resemblance to P C Barua himself…so did the director himself decide to play the role of the son in his Hindi version???

-Saigal had a walk-on part in the Barua’s Bengali version and sang two Tamil songs in the Tamil version made in 1936. Unfortunately copyright prevents me from embedding the audio here but do try pasting this link on to a new page and the song will be played although clarity is not very good.

( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZVU0pbXBNj4)

-In Bimal Roy’s version, there is a scene where Suchitra Sen and Vyjayantimala travelling in opposite directions come face to face for a few minutes, this never occurs in the book.

-Some versions showed Devdas’s father threatening to commit suicide if Devdas did not listen to him and abide by his decisions. such a deviation affects the essence of the story.

-Director Bhansali took extraordinary cinematic liberty while deviating from the plot. His emphasis on grandiose sets, ostentatious get-up, artificial settings and loud confrontation scenes were not only jarring to the eye, they also took away the simplicity of the village lifestyle and ended up murdering the very soul of the story. Here Devdas returns from London and we even had Parvati and Chandramukhi dancing together!!!

-‘Dev D’ was a modern take on the same story set in the rustic and colorful Punjab and also explores the dingy, morbid, dark underbelly of Delhi. Again a stark deviation from the original.

bhojdev-The Bhojpuri version had the audacity to change the ending by not only showing Parvati actually crossing the threshold and meeting Devdas but also had Chandramukhi joining her in to cry along with her !!! Which makes us wonder how do these people get the right to deviate from the story so much?

-Another funny deviation I came across was regarding the age of Parvati, her widower husband and his children. In the actual story Parvati is a young teenager who marries a man around 40 years of age and who has three grown up kids. Except for the heroine Jamuna Barua who looked girlish and very young, all the other heroines looked  older and consequently the age of the widower also increased. They were doddering old men with the number of children in the Tamil and Telugu versions suddenly becoming more than three with the smaller ones being 4-8 years of age!

telugu devdas

-It is said that when Sarat Chandra was shown the Bengali version of the film he loved it so much that he felt it was almost as if Barua had been born to play the role and give it a memorable status. He was all praise for the way Barua ended the film showing the door closing on Parvati which he felt was the touch of a genius. He had not ended the book that way and according to him that one cinematic moment conveyed what a thousand words could not have done.

-Having studied filmmaking in Europe, the techniques employed by Barua in the film were very advanced for that era. The use of ‘jump cuts’ was astounding for the effect it had-for instance, towards end there is a scene when Devdas vomits blood while coughing in the train, he calls out Parvati’s name and the next scene showed a window opening in Parvati’s bedroom with violent winds and she rushes towards the window as she hears her name. All this added magic to the celluloid version !

-Sadly C.R.Subburaman, a harmonium player who gave music to the Telugu version Devadasu did not live long enough to see how popular his music for Devadasu would become. He passed away before the release of the film.

-Unfortunately only six out of the fourteen reels of the first ‘Devdas‘ starring Barua are available and that too have been obtained with great difficulty from the film archives of Bangladesh.

-Much like the character Devdas‘ in the story, both P C Barua and K L Saigal in real life took to alcohol and died prematurely making their real-life images almost merge with that of the character they immortalized on screen…

 IN CONCLUSION

Though many attempts have been made to re-incarnate this character again and again, the success and impact which Saigal’s ‘Devdas’ enjoyed remains unbeatable. After seeing several versions of the film  I feel that though many  accomplished actors tried to add their own persona and interpret the character in their own way none could leave as lasting an impression as that of Saigal as ‘Devdas’… He remains the original, others only recreated him.

Sarat Chandra Chatterjee created the hero in print, P C Barua put life into him with his brilliant directorial vision and ultimately K L Saigal  transformed himself and became ‘Devdas’ on screen…

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A TRIBUTE TO RAJESH KHANNA: Remembering the Phenomenon on his 4th Death Anniversary

By

Sharada Iyer

It is four years since Rajesh Khanna left us leaving behind a void which can never be filled. With his death the era of romance in Hindi cinema came to an end. Much like his character in the film Anand, Rajesh Khanna in real life also succumbed to cancer and embraced death with dignity and a smile. It is said that his last words before he died were “It is time to pack up!”

khanna3

The city gave its beloved superstar a fitting farewell when thousands of his fans, supporters and industry people turned up braving the pouring rain to catch a glimpse of their favourite star who had touched the lives of so many with his endearing screen-persona, his handsome face, his heart-warming smile, his natural acting and a repertoire of memorable songs to be stored in our hearts forever.

khanna1He was just a young man of 25 or 26 when he became a superstar overnight, had 16-17 super-hit films in a row and probably was not even equipped to deal with the kind of frenzy he whipped up. With the result he could never really grasp the real reason behind his extraordinary downfall either. To his credit he handled these extreme phases as best as he could and over a period of time actually came to terms with it gracefully.

It is easy today to sit back and point out at his shortcomings and the mistakes he made but one has to understand that he had neither bargained for nor dreamt of in his wildest dreams that he would ever see such extreme phases in his career. And where is the guarantee that in his place anyone else would not have behaved like that?

Interestingly apart from his on-screen popular pairing with heroines like Mumtaz, Sharmila Tagore and Hema Malini, Rajesh Khanna  also shared a terrific rapport with some great character actors of that time like  Ashok Kumar, Om Prakash, A K Hangal, Prem Chopra, Sujit Kumar, Helen, Bindu, Asrani, etc., which translated into great on-screen tuning whenever they shared screen space.

The very mention of Rajesh Khanna’s name brings to our mind innumerable songs picturized on him most of them sung by Kishore Kumar who came to be known as his voice. Almost all his songs were super-hits probably because his facial expressions and expressive eyes added so much life in the songs that they became extensions of his personality.

In this blog I am presenting some of his songs which are not featured commonly when articles are written on him or a list of his popular songs are compiled. The songs have been taken from those films which either did not do too well or if they did, this song was overtaken in popularity by other song/songs of the same film. Hence they remain sort of hidden in his repertoire even though the ‘Rajesh Khanna magic’ is intact in each of them…

Raaz (1967)

Director Ravindra Dave whipped up a murder mystery with newcomers Rajesh Khanna and Babita along with I S Johar , Sapru and Kamal Kapoor.  Rajesh Khanna  was lucky to play a double role in the very first film he signed though his ‘Aakhri Khat’ hit the theatres earlier. In the story,one of them is in Africa and is repeatedly haunted by images in his sleep of a place in India and when he comes to India to investigate, a lot of mysterious things are uncovered. Also the villagers are stunned to see him as they keep telling him that he has actually been murdered and buried. All this suspense on print which had the potential for a blockbuster could not be translated into a successful film as the audience felt cheated by the loose narrative, too many songs and side stories.

However to be fair, the film starts off very well , the lead pair look fresh and super-confident in their debut film and also come up with praiseworthy performances. The song ‘Akele Hain Chale aao …’ became so popular that somehow this lovely Mukesh-Lata duet which I have posted here remains hidden unless you go looking for it… 

Aurat (1967)

A family social with plenty of melodrama typical of films remade from South Indian blockbusters. This one was a remake of ‘Chitti’ and Padmini essayed the role of the sacrificing protagonist in both languages. Since this was Rajesh Khanna’s third film after Aakhri Khat and Raaz, he had a small role and was part of a stellar cast which included Pran, Kanhaiyyalal, Lalita Pawar and Feroze Khan in important roles. He plays Padmini’s brother who falls in love with the Pran’s daughter Nazima.

In the song Khanna looks so nice and boyish and seems very confident for a newcomer. Nazima  looks good opposite him.

Choti Bahu (1971)

This film was based on Sarat Chandra Chatterjee’s Bengali story ‘Bindur Chheley’ and had a good cast of Rajesh Khanna, Sharmila Tagore, Nirupa Roy , Tarun Bose , Satyen Kappu and Baby Sarika  as a boy. In keeping with the other stories written by the author, this one too has a complicated plot and  well-etched out characters though the female protagonist here is not exactly likeable!

Sharmila Tagore essays the title role wherein the character grows up doting on a doll and every time someone snatches it from her, she has an epileptic fit. Her father is told that she will be cured of this malady only when she gets married and has a kid of her own. Her alliance is sent to Khanna’s family who agree immediately but the truth about her condition is kept hidden. Understandably, the plot opens itself for a lot of confrontations, complications and drama before reaching the end!

Acting by the entire cast is noteworthy with Rajesh Khanna playing a doctor. In this film again the popularity of the song ‘Hey re kanhaiyya, kisko kahega tu maiyya …’ with meaningful lyrics apt for the situation eclipses the others which end up being a mere shadow of this brilliant song which is incidentally picturized on an extra.

The song chosen here is a soft romantic number sung by Rafi conveying Khanna’s pining for his wife…

Dil Daulat Duniya (1972)

This fun-filled social drama starring Om Prakash, Ashok Kumar, Rajesh Khanna , Sadhna and Agha directed by P N Arora was a remake of the 1948 film Pugree , which in turn was a remake  of the 1947 Hollywood film It Happened on Fifth Avenue. It had a sweet story wherein a homeless man Om Prakash enters the mansion of a rich businessman who is away every year for six months at a stretch, pretends to be the owner and offers shelter for that period to other homeless and jobless people like him. Circumstances lead to the real owner Ashok Kumar disguising as a vagabond and  coming and staying in his own house without revealing his real identity and the ensuing series of events is enjoyable.

The film sadly did not do well and music by Shankar-Jaikishen though not outstanding was pleasant. This song is picturized on the trio of Rajesh Khanna-Sadhna and Helen. Somehow the Rajesh Khanna-Sadhna pair did not look good as she looked much older than him.

Joroo Ka Gulaam (1972)

I have never understood why this gem of a film hardly finds a mention in either Rajesh Khanna’s list of best films or in the list of best comedy films produced in Hindi cinema. The story has elements of fun and romance in the right proportion with foot-tapping music by Kalyanji-Anandji. Rajesh Khanna-Nanda pair share a great chemistry and their comic timing is superb to watch. 

When rich girl Nanda decides to marry a not so well-off Khanna, parental objections make her run away and get married and since they stay in another city Nanda’s parents have never met Khanna. When Nanda gives birth to a son, the parents decide to forgive and forget and express their wish to come and stay with Nanda. Complications arise as Nanda had written letters with lying about her husband’s new job and how wealthy they are. The film thereafter is a laugh-riot and needless to say Om Prakash gets to play another delightful role as Nanda’s father.

This particular song is picturized so imaginatively and fits the situation perfectly to show Rajesh Khanna’s predicament in the film where he is pretending to be a cook in his wife’s house.

Shehzaada (1972)

This is a film which is hardly talked about while mentioning his films. Set in time of pre-independent India the film is quite enjoyable in spite of the fairly predictable twists and turns that happen. Veena plays a dominant role in this and Rajesh Khanna is her grandson. Raakhee and Rajesh Khanna make a winsome pair.

Usually when we think of rain songs, it is the popular Rajesh-Zeenat number ‘Bheegi bheegi raaton mein…’ from Ajnabi  which comes to our mind. The song I have chosen from the film is also a romantic song in the rain which is very enjoyable but not heard very often on radio or seen on any television channels.

Humshakal (1974)

Rajesh Khanna gets to play an interesting double role here-that of a poor man who is paired opposite Moushmi Chatterjee and his affluent look-alike who is paired opposite Tanuja. Due to certain circumstances, the poor man has to juggle between both the households pretending to be Tanuja’s husband also for some time. He struggles to keep this lifestyle a secret from both the women but things take a turn for the worse and Moushmi misunderstands him. Also a tragedy befalls them but finally things fall in place.

The film had many lovely songs but the song I have chosen is the least heard of the lot. It is a beautiful song rendered with a lot of feeling by Kishore Kumar and picturized on the ‘poor’ Khanna pretending to be the father to the ‘affluent’ Khanna’s daughter.

Bundalbaaz (1976)

This film directed by Shammi Kapoor had Shammi himself playing a genie with magical powers as can be seen in the song.  Rajesh Khanna though a graduate is forced due to circumstances to take up the job of a ragpicker in the film selling old bottles and papers. One day he chances upon a bottle from which a genie appears and insisis on serving him for at least one year. Soon his life changes overnight and he also gets to woo the rich girl of his dreams. Again it was a new kind of film for its time and though not a super-hit it did reasonably well. Sulakshna Pandit gets to star opposite him in this fantasy film.

Here is a Rafi-Lata duet where the stars are dressed as ShahJahan and Mumtaz Mahal…

The Red Rose (1980)

This film was remake of the super-hit Tamil film ‘Sigappu Rojakkal’ starring Kamalahasan . Directed by BharatiRaja it was said to have been inspired by the killings of Raman Raghav the psychological serial killer who committed chilling murders in the sixties. Rajesh Khanna plays a mentally disturbed killer who preys on young girls, rapes and murders them, buries them in his backyard and plants a red rose on the ground.

What made Khanna choose such a weird role remains a mystery. Somehow his romantic image was too overpowering for the audience to accept him in the role of a cold-blooded killer but one must admire Khanna’s guts to take on such a horrific role at that time. Probably if the audience had been as receptive as they are today , the film may have become a super-hit (actor Nawazuddin Siddique has received rave reviews for playing a psychotic killer in the recently released Raman Raghav).

Poonam Dhillon stars opposite Khanna and also marries him unaware of his disturbed past. It is only after marriage that she gets to know and plot has enough scenes which are scary and revolting. This Kishore Kumar song is a breezy number with the typical R D Burman beats…

 

Maalik (1972)

In this film, a devout Krishna devotee Rajesh Khanna falls in love and marries an atheist Sharmila Tagore. Needless to say there is enough juice for a lot of clashes and arguments between their ideologies throughout the film. Things take a major turn when the son born to them has a deadly incurable illness which may cripple him to exist like a vegetable for life without any movement of limbs and maybe even speech and hearing impaired. Khanna blames it on her saying that it is God’s way of punishing her for being a non-believer. In turn she questions his devout faith asking why the same God did not reward him for his belief as the son belongs to both of them.

After a lot of melodrama and the appearance of Lord Krishna in the form of a small cowherd, the film reaches its happy ending by which time she also turns into a firm believer. If the purpose behind making such a film was to have complete faith in the Almighty and never to question His decisions, the results were quite pathetic as the plot was too contrived for the audience to appreciate. Rajesh Khanna is seen in a somewhat subdued and different avatar and definitely he will not be blamed   for not trying different roles in his career. The song chosen here is a pleasant ‘bhajan’ in the voice of Mahendra Kapoor.

Amar Deep (1979)

Rajesh Khanna plays an arrogant and wealthy womaniser but when he sets his eyes on his servant’s daughter (Shabana Azmi) he decides to settle down and expresses his desire to marry her. But she turns him down stating her hatred for his philandering ways and the fact that she loves another man (Vinod Mehra). This does not go down well with Khanna who now takes a villainous route to get even with her. He even plots to have Vinod Mehra killed but in the nick of the time the real identity of the latter is revealed which leaves a shocked Rajesh Khanna repentant of his behaviour and the crime he was about to commit.

The film was a remake of Tamil film Deepam which in turn was a remake of the Malayalam film Theekannal. Shabana matched Khanna’s histrionic intensity and their confrontation scenes were a delight to watch. The duet chosen ‘Tum nahin maanoge tum nahin jaanoge..’ here is one which is a figment of Rajesh Khanna’s imagination…

Karm (1977)

Director B R Chopra directs a triangular love-story with Rajesh Khanna-Vidya Sinha and Shabana Azmi.  Due to some starnge astrological prediction which spells doom for the couple if they get married, Rajesh Khanna and Vidya Sinha decide to start a live-in relationship and she even gets pregnant. The idea being very modern for its time, the conservative society decides to blacklist them. Then by a quirk of fate she disappears from his life and he ends up marrying Shabana and the latter on finding about his past love gets angry and while driving at high speed meets with an accident.

Though the performances were good, it is a  highly forgettable movie by Rajesh Khanna’s standards and released during the year when Amitabh Bachchan’s breezy entertainers Amar Akbar Anthony , Khoon Pasina, and Parvarish were making waves, Karm with its convoluted plot barely managed to scrape through. However the song I have chosen is definitely worth listening…

Chhaila Babu (1977)

Directed by Joy Mukherjee, the film is an out and out racy thriller which showcased Rajesh Khanna in a dashing action role and paired opposite sexy Zeenat Aman, the film had a lot of entertaining moments typical of a masala movie of the seventies. A horde of villains –Macmohan, Manmohan, Roopesh Kumar, Ranjeet, Om Shivpuri, etc., are there to add to the suspense in the story which revolves around a gang of robbers who operate for a secret head called Scorpion whose identity is revealed only in the end. All suspicion points to Khanna himself who surprises by coming in various get-ups.

The song here is an almost unheard of number as only the title song of the film became a huge hit. Watch out for the man with a gun hiding in the song…  

 

 

 

 

Salman in terrific form in SULTAN

By

Sharada Iyer

After Bajrangi Bhaijan and Prem Ratan Dhan Paayo, Salman Khan once again comes up with a terrific performance and surprises with a ‘hatke’ role which does not conform to his typical ‘superhero’ image. Though he plays a wrestler and there are some brilliantly choreographed fight sequences in the film, Sultan at its heart is a love story which tugs our heart with a see-saw of emotions which we experience along with the protagonists.

Set in the Rewari district of Haryana, the story traces the life of a happy-go-lucky simpleton who takes to wrestling to win over his lady-love and goes through various ups and downs in life making him confront some unexpected situations. Apart from the physical fight in the arena or the ‘akhada’, Salman Khan’s character is shown fighting an inner battle with his own self and he does complete justice to his role delivering a heartening performance which remains with us long after the film is over.

Anushka Sharma in the role of the feisty wrestler (yes, she also plays a champion wrestler) comes up with an excellent performance and her pairing with Salman Khan is both refreshing and fun to watch. Randeep Hooda in a small role as Salman’s coach is perfectly cast and so are Anant Sharma as Salman Khan’s best friend and Kumud Mishra as Anushka’s father. Amit Sadh also looked very good in his role and it would be good to see more of him in future films…

Direction by Abbas Ali Zafar is top-notch and so are the dialogues written by him.  The ‘akhada’ scenes pre-interval are very well done and it sure required a lot of guts on Salman’s part to don the wrestling costume at his age but to his credit he looks fit and  carries it off with aplomb. The fight sequences in the MMA league competition post-interval have been directed superbly and with utmost authenticity. With a lot of nail-biting moments and a flow of emotions the fight scenes in the last 45 minutes raise the bar of the film by several notches and definitely form the highlight of the film.

Two of the songs ‘Jag Ghoomeya …’ by Rahat Fateh Ali Khan and the theme song ‘Sultan…’ by Sukhwinder Singh are really good. The other songs could have been easily avoided as neither the tune nor the picturization are worth a mention.

At a running time of almost 3 hours, the film is definitely long and some in the audience may find a few scenes a tad repetitive. Also for those who just don’t like to see fight sequences, no point in venturing but for all Salman fans the film is a  sure treat.

The recent releases are certainly indicating a change in Salman Khan’s outlook towards the characters he wishes to play in the future befitting his age and maturity. He also seems to be confidently delving into his histrionic side which not many directors have had the guts to exploit and remained always overshadowed by his overpowering ‘superstar’ and ‘Bhai’ image. Hopefully he will surprise us with a few more aces in the future…

Meanwhile, give this film a dekko… you won’t regret it ! 

 

DUAL VERSIONS OF SAME SONG WITH KISHORE KUMAR:Part II

By

Sharada Iyer

Often in our films the same song has been sung by two different playback singers and are woven into the narrative in such a way that they appear at different times in the course of the film depending on the story and the mood of the characters involved.

In this two-part blog , I have included dual versions of only those songs in which one of the versions is sung by Kishore Kumar and the other version is by singers which include Lata Mangeshkar, Asha Bhonsle, Mohammed Rafi, Shamshad Begum, Sadhna Sargam, Parveen Sultana, Hemant Kumar and Ashok Kumar.

This is an effort to bring to fore the magic of ‘Kishore-da’, who was always underestimated for his lack of technical knowledge of classical songs and had to go through a period of twenty years as a singer-actor (so that he could at least sing his own songs), before becoming a full-fledged playback singer.

There were 15 songs in the first part of the series.  Here I have posted 16 more…

16 ‘ Eena meena deeka…'(Aasha)

This evergreen number from the film 1957 film had both Kishore Kumar and Asha Bhonsle singing a robust dance number set to a fast-paced peppy tune by the veteran composer C Ramchandra. It is one of the Hindi cinema’s first rock and roll numbers the words of which were supposedly inspired by kids playing outside composer C. Ramchandra’s music room. The kids were chanting “Eeny, meeny, miny, moe”, which inspired Ramchandra and his assistant John Gomes to create first line of the song, “Eena Meena Deeka, De Dai Damanika”. Gomes, who was a Goan, added the words “Maka naka” (Konkani for “I don’t want”). They kept on adding more nonsense rhymes till they ended with “Rum pum po!”.

 The Asha Bhonsle version is played twice in the film- one picturized on Vyjayantimala and the other one on Minoo Mumtaz (this version comes at the fag-end of the film). Both actresses were seasoned female dancers of their time and added a lot of pizzaz to the song but all that pales into oblivion when compared to the incredible energy, enthusiasm, vitality and a little madness that Kishore Kumar brings to his version. Added to that his facial expressions and unique dance steps take the song to such dizzying heights which the makers may not even have conceived thus making the song one of the biggest hits of Kishore Kumar’s acting as well as singing career.  

Kishore

Asha

17 ‘Zindagi pyar ka geet hai…'( Souten)

1983 gave a boost to Rajesh Khanna’s sagging career with some good films coming his way like Avtaar, Agar Tum Na Hote and Souten. In Souten he teamed with two very young heroines Tina Munim and Padmini Kolhapure and excellent performances and a peppy sound track by music director Usha Khanna turned this triangular love-story into a big box-office success.

The story had enough juice to insert dual versions of a lovely song with meaningful lyrics. While Lata Mangeshkar got to sing the happier version of the song, Kishore Kumar added a lot of pathos  and feelings and turned the sad version of this number into a memorable hit.

Kishore

Lata

18 ‘ Hame aur jeene ki chaahat na hoti…’ (Agar Tum Na Hote)

This film had a very interesting story-line wherein Rekha plays a double role-that of Rajesh Khanna’s wife as well as Raj Babbar’s wife. The twist in the script is that Rajesh Khanna’s wife dies at childbirth and ironically the governess who applies for the job of looking after the child is none other than the look-alike Rekha, who is Raj Babbar’s wife. But to get the job, she has to hide her marital status thus leading to a lot of misunderstanding and drama.

The song in question comes many times during the movie depending on the mood of the setting and the character singing. Hence meaningful lyrics once again lend power to the song and though both the singers are brilliant, the lines sung by Kishore Kumar leave a special stamp in our hearts…

Lata-Kishore-Lata-Kishore

19 ‘Chanda o chanda…'(Laakhon Mein Ek)

This 1971 AVM film was a remake of their own hit Tamil film ‘Edirneechal’ made in 1968 with an ensemble cast of excellent character artistes. While the Tamil film had comedian-actor Nagesh as the hero, the Hindi version had super talented Mehmood reprising the role with aplomb. Though the story does have plenty of melodrama it gives chance for the unsung character artistes of our industry to display their prowess.

 The movie had only three songs and one of them was this super-hit dual version ‘Chanda o chanda…’ sung by Kishore Kumar and Lata Mangeshkar which come in the movie within almost ten minutes of one another. Both songs convey the angst of the protagonists who are not treated well by the residents of the ‘chawl’ they are residing in often taking advantage of their simplicity and honesty. The Kishore version doubles up as a lullaby as well and his deep sonorous voice once again turned the tide in his favour making it a memorable number.

Kishore

Lata

 20 ‘Samjhauta ghamon se kar lo…’ (Samjhauta)

Samjhauta deals with overcoming life’s hurdles with a brave face and rising to every challenge that come in our way. The story is also about love, friendship and lessons which life teaches us. The song sung by both Kishore Kumar and Lata Mangeshkar has a very pleasing tune and  acts like a motivational song. While Yogeeta Bali is helping Anil Dhawan to deal with his blindness, Anil Dhawan sings it to the jail-inmates trying to give them a ray of hope for a brighter future.

Once again it is Kishore Kumar’s robust vocals filled with a lot of feelings which takes the song to great heights tugging our hearts with the meaningful lyrics.

Kishore

Lata

21 ‘Tera mujhse hai pehle ka nata koi…’ (Aa Gale Lag Ja)

This song forms a very important part of the film connecting the hero-heroine and their illegitimate child as can be understood while watching the videos of the songs. Here Kishore Kumar really has no competition as youngster Sushma Shreshta is clearly no match for the magical voice of Kishore and not surprisingly his romantic version became a tremendous hit. In the other version also he gets to sing a few lines albeit with a tinge of sadness befitting the situation.     

Sushma Shreshta

Kishore

22 ‘Tum bin jaun kahan…’ (Pyar  Ka Mausam)

In 1968, Kishore Kumar decided to quit acting and concentrate only on playback and this coincided with the arrival of a new face Rajesh Khanna on the scene and together they created history. With Kishore’s soaring popularity Mohammed  Rafi had to take a backseat and this became very evident in the film Pyar Ka Mausam which had the melodious ‘Tum bin jaun kahan…’ sung in the voices of Kishore and Rafi.

Kishore Kumar had only one song in the film and that too was not picturized on the hero Shashi Kapoor but on his father played by Bharat Bhushan. It was R D Burman and his musicians who coaxed Nazir Hussain to give at least the father’s version to Kishore Kumar and after the rigamarole only one stanza made it to the final version in the film. On the other hand Rafi had the romantic version a well as a sad version played fully in the film.

As with the other dual versions, once again the rich baritone and emotional intensity of Kishore Kumar’s voice wove magic into the song making it indisputably the better version…

Rafi- happy version

Rafi- sad version

Kishore-happy version

Kishore-sad version

23 ‘Aari aaja, nindiya tu le chal kahin…’ (Kunwara  Baap)

Mehmood decided to wield the directorial baton for this one and was lauded for his efforts to take up a story which showcased the importance of administering the polio vaccine in infants. A lot of top stars of that time did special appearance to show their support .The film managed to drive home the point albeit with a lot of melodrama.

Music director Rajesh Roshan made his debut with this film and came up with a winning score. For the first time a song was picturized on real-life eunuchs with Mehmood and Rafi joining them and the song went on to become a chart-topper of that year. Coming to the song in this post, ‘Aari aaja nindiya…’ is a lullaby sung by Kishore Kumar and Lata Mangeshkar the latter being picturized on a young boy who plays Mehmood’s adopted son in the film. As expected  Kishore Kumar’s version in his deep resonant voice appealed much more to the listeners…

Kishore

Lata

24 ‘Yaadon Ki Baraat…’ (Yaadon Ki Baraat)

This 1971 blockbuster had the timeless tale of separation of the members of a close-knit family of father mother and three brothers and it is this song which the mother used to sing that ultimately helps to reunite them with one another. The film turned out to be one of the biggest blockbusters of its time with superlative music from R D Burman and a stylish Zeenat Aman being the big plus points.  

While the Kishore-Rafi duet version of the song picturized on the grown-up brothers was sheer magic from the word go and remains hugely popular to this day, the Lata Mangeshkar version picturized on the mother somehow lacked the charm to work its way into the hearts of audience and is heard very rarely.The unmistakable power in Kishore Kumar’s vocals comes across so beautifully in this song.

Lata and chorus

Kishore-Rafi

25 ‘Hame tumse pyaar kitna…’ (Kudrat)

After Mehbooba, Rajesh Khanna and Hema-Malini once again team up to give us another story of re-incarnation with Raj Kumar, Aruna Irani, Vinod Khanna and Priya Rajvansh also playing pivotal roles. The last 45 minutes of the film are devoted to an interesting murder trial with Rajesh Khanna playing the prosecutor and Priya Rajvansh the defence lawyer defending her father Raj Kumar.

This song based on Raag Bhairavi has a simple version sung by Kishore Kumar picturized on Rajesh Khanna  and a classical version sung by Parveen Sultana which is picturized on Aruna Irani who plays his sister in the film. Though the latter brings a lot of nuances to the song and even won the best female playback singer award for the same, it is Kishore Kumar’s simple rendition sung from the heart which stirs the listener’s soul and is considered to be one of his evergreen numbers. Once again Kishore Kumar proves that no amount of classical training can eclipse a God-given magical voice…

Kishore

Parveen Sultana

26 ‘O Saathi re, tere bina bhi kya jeena…’ (Muquaddar ka Sikander)

he Kishore Kumar version of this song was rendered with so much pain and intensity that it ranks among the finest sad songs sung in his career. The scene just before the song is  a heart-breaking one for Amitabh Bachchan for that is when he comes to know that the very girl he had loved and respected from a young age was not only unaware of his real identity but was presently in love with his best friend. 

On the other hand, Asha Bhonsle’s mature voice just doesn’t suit such a young female child artiste, playing the younger version of Raakhee. The song looks very artificial on her and hence the effect of the words is also totally lost. Once again the Kishore Kumar  version triumphs…

Kishore

Asha

27 ‘Neele neele amber par…’ (Kalaakar)

Kalakaar was a remake of the Tamil blockbuster ‘Payanangal Mudivathillai’ which had some superb songs by music director Ilayaraja. The Hindi version starring Sridevi and Manoj Kumar’s son Kunal Goswami was a super-flop with Bappi Lahiri’s music not matching up to the original’s score except the song ‘Neele neele amber par…’ which was lifted directly from the original ‘ Ilaya Nila Poyzhigirade…’, sung by singer S P Balasubramanian.

The Kishore Kumar version of the song turned out to be a super-hit. The Sadhna Sargam version which sounds quite average was hardly heard and was missing from the film also. Only the audio version is available on YouTube.

Kishore

Sadhna Sargam

28 ‘Kitne bhi tu karle sitam…’ (Sanam Teri Kasam)

This was an average film produced by the heroine Reena Roy’s sister Barkha Roy. However, this film is a milestone in R D Burman’s career as he won his first Filmfare award for ‘Best Music Director’ for this film. For a man who started his career in 1961 and gave some scintillating music throughout his career, this must have been so heart-breaking. He was nominated fifteen times and ironically the nominations didn’t include films like Amar Prem, Hare Rama Hare Krishna, Teesri Manzil, etc…

Coming to the song in this post, as one can see that though both versions are happy with an element of teasing and playfulness in them, it was the Kishore Kumar version which became more popular.

Kishore

Asha

29 ‘Phoolon ka taaron ka…’ (Hare Rama Hare Krishna)

The music of this film fell on R D Burman’s lap after S D Burman refused the film as he is said to have professed his disinterest in composing for a film based on hippies and a brother-sister relationship. R D Burman grabbed the opportunity and composed some mesmerizing songs including the cult number ‘Dum maro dum…’ for the film and cemented his position as a genius composer of Hindi films.

The Kishore Kumar version of this song picturized on Dev Anand singing for his sister Zeenat Aman in the film attained such incredible popularity that it almost became a sort of ‘anthem’ for conveying  a brother’s affection for his sister and continues to be played on radio even today on ‘rakshabandhan’ day. In contrast , the Lata Mangeshkar version picturized on child artistes Master Satyajeet and Baby Guddi, who play the young Dev Anand and Zeenat Aman respectively did not bring in the same emotion…the magic was missing. 

 Kishore Kumar

Lata

30 ‘De de pyaar de…’ (Sharaabi)

This film had a superlative performance from Amitabh Bachchan which earned him a nomination in the’Best Actor’ category and very good music from Bappi Lahiri which fetched him Filmfare’s ‘Best Music Director’ award. All four nominations  in the male playback singer category went to Kishore Kumar’s songs and all were from this film, one of them being his version of the song ‘De de pyar de…’

Both Kishore Kumar and Asha Bhonsle sing the song with great verve and in the film the two songs are played back to back- Asha’s version followed by Kishore’s. Somehow Asha Bhonsle’s version could not whip up the same popularity as Kishore Kumar’s…

Kishore

Asha

31’Koi Humdum na raha, koi sahara na raha…’ 

Unlike the other 30 songs posted in the two parts of this blog, the different versions of this gem of a song belong to different eras and different films. While the first version from the 1936 film Jeevan Naiyya is sung by Ashok Kumar and composed by the female music director Saraswati Devi, the second version was composed and sung by Kishore Kumar himself. He modified the tune slightly, made it faster and the resulting song in his voice is so magical that it is almost unbelievable.

Am attaching the video where elder brother Ashok Kumar affectionately talks of how a young Kishore was so haunted by the tune of this song that he had sworn that though he did not understand the inherent intricacies of the song’s grammar, one day he would sing the song and in a different way and maybe a better way than Ashok Kumar and he actually did it…

Ashok Kumar (Jeevan Naiyya, 1936)

Kishore Kumar (Jhumroo, 1961)

Though this two-part blog-series on Kishore Kumar’s dual versions is in no way meant to show disrespect to the other singers, it is an irrefutable fact that whenever Kishore Kumar was involved in the dual versions, it was always his version which gained extraordinary popularity and it was his resonating voice that left an indelible mark often eclipsing the version by the other singer.

Maybe somewhere divinity played  a role in proving the inborn talent of this maverick genius for once we hear the songs in his voice it is his version that remains in our hearts…

Here is the link to the Part I of this blog:

(https://myviewsonbollywood.wordpress.com/2016/06/02/dual-versions-of-the-same-song-with-kishore-kumar-part-i/)

 

DADASAHEB PHALKE: Remembering the Father of the Indian Film Industry

 By

 Sharada Iyer

 dadasaheb

A hundred and three years back, one man’s passion and vision gave birth to what has become a billion dollar industry today which has managed to carve a unique identity for itself commanding respect from a worldwide audience and holds the distinction of producing the maximum number of films in the world in a year.

The man was Dhundiraj Govind Phalke or Dadasaheb Phalke as he is popularly referred to and with the release of his first silent film ‘Raja Harishchandra’, he not only became the Father of our Indian Cinema, but also inadvertently sowed the seeds of a passionate and deep-rooted relationship between movies and moviegoers in our country which has only grow deeper with the passage of time.

200px-Publicity_poster_for_film,_Raja_Harishchandra_(1913)My article is but a small tribute to this visionary genius…

May 3rd, 1913: This historic day marked the beginning of the journey of Indian cinema. ‘Raja Harishchandra’, the first indigenously made Indian cinema was released at Mumbai’s Coronation Cinema, Girgaum, where crowds thronged the roads outside the hall. They were too excited to see their very own mythological story in the form of a movie.

The story was based on the legend of the noble and righteous king, Raja Harishchandra, who sacrifices everything-his kingdom, his wife and eventually his child to honour his promise to Sage Vishwamitra. In the end, pleased with his high morals, the gods restore his former glory and bestow him with divine blessings.

Here is a link to some priceless moving images from this precious film. Unfortunately, today only parts of the first and last reel are preserved. One can see the genius of the filmmaker and the tremendous efforts taken by him. It is also not difficult to imagine the magical effect the film must have had on the public when it was released.

Raja Harishchandra

Interesting Trivia:

ist filmThe film had an all-Marathi star-cast. Dattatreya Damodar Dabke, a Marathi stage actor, in the title role of the king, became the first hero of Indian cinema and as women were unwilling to act in front of a camera, a delicate looking male cook working in a restaurant-Anna Salunke, donned the garb of a woman to play the role of the queen and technically he became our cinema’s first ‘heroine’.

While Dadasaheb Phalke’s little son, Balachandra D Phalke who played the role of the young prince in ‘Raja Harishchandra’, 1913, became Indian cinema’s first male child artiste, a few years later in 1919, his talented daughter Mandakini  became the first female child artiste of Indian cinema when she played the role of Lord Krishna in his silent film ‘Kaliya Mardan’.kaliya mardan 1919

In 1913 he made his second film ‘Mohini Bhasmasur’,  for which he requested the director of a travelling drama company to lend him two of their actresses – Durgabai Kamat and her daughter Kamlabai Gokhale and they became the first actresses of our industry.

In 1917, he made ‘Lanka Dahan’ showing the kidnapping of Sita and subsequent burning of Lanka by Hanuman. The film had Anna Salunke playing the role of Lord Ram as well as Sita thus officially making it Indian Cinema’s first ‘double role’ by any actor.

Here is a link of his silent film ‘Kaliya Mardan’ featuring his daughter in a full-fletched role. The film has many hilarious situations showing Little Krishna up to his childhood pranks. The last scene where Krishna comes out dancing on the snake is really well taken considering the rudimentary techniques at his disposal

Kaliya Mardan

The Beginning:

One day, he happened to watch a silent French film ‘Life of Christ’ which changed the course of his life. He became so obsessed with the film that he saw it several times and started dreaming of making a film of his own replacing Christ with our own gods- Krishna, Ram, etc., and telling stories from our own epics. He had been a printer and a photographer apart from having fascination for magic tricks before this passion engulfed him.

Initially with the equipment at his disposal, he made a small clip showing the growth of a pea-plant and whoever saw it was fascinated with the idea of moving images. With co-operation and understanding from his family, he decided to put everything at stake to turn his obsession into reality. He sold the printing press, pawned his wife’s jewellery and sold almost everything in the house to get money to go to London. He wanted to study the technique of making films and also buy movie camera to shoot the film.

PhalkeHe faced many a hurdle during the course of making the film even coming close to losing his eyesight due to strain but his spirit never dampened.  He rented a flat in Dadar to shoot the scenes. He wrote the script, designed the sets, wrote the scenes, chose the locations and artistes, directed the shots, handled the camera, edited and produced the film and after seven months, 21 days, aided by a hard working team, managed to complete the film.

It was first premiered on April 21st, 1913, at the Olympia Theatre, Grant Road, Mumbai only for a selective audience which included famous personalities of Mumbai and editors of newspapers and finally shown to the public on May 3rd, 1913 and history was created.

Phalke’s whole journey from his obsession to the release of the film has been beautifully captured in the 2009 biopic titled ‘Harishchandrachi Factory’ and directed by Prakash Mokasi. It is a Marathi film with subtitles in English and anyone who loves cinema must watch this film to understand his journey and be part of his unbelievable adventure.

Here is the YouTube link to this beautiful film. A small amount is to be paid to buy the film or rent and watch it.

Here is the trailer of this film which will give an idea of what to expect in the film. It was India’s official entry to Oscar that year but unfortunately failed to win the award. That in no way takes away the merit of this not-to-be-missed film.

Other Interesting Facts:

Born in Triambakeshwar, Nasik, Maharashtra, to a Sankrit professor Daji Shastri Phalke, Dhundiraj always had an artistic bent of mind. When his father got a job at Wilson College, Mumbai, young Dhundiraj was admitted to the J J School of Arts. Later he also attended Kala Bhavan, Maharaja Sayajirao University of Baroda in Vadodara, where he studied sculpture, engineering, drawing, painting and photography. He also worked in Archaeological Survey of India.

Dadasaheb Phalke made a total of 100-125 films in his 25-year long career.

raja-harishchandraAs a young lad, he had worked with the painting genius Raja Ravi Verma as an apprentice for some time when the latter was staying in Mumbai. In 1893, Ravi Verma opened a printing press ‘Ravi Verma Pictures Depot’ with a view to mass produce his paintings so that his art would reach out to every person in the country irrespective of caste and status. At that time many young students from J J School of Art were working with him the brightest among them being Dhundiraj Phalke.

For photo-litho transfers, the Pictures Depot relied on Phalke’s Engraving and Printing technique.  Raja Ravi Verma is said to have given money to Phalke to buy equipment like projector, camera, etc. (point to ponder- maybe if it were not for his encouragement, Phalke would not have founded the film industry… and things would have taken a different turn…).This aspect has been brought out very well in Ketan Mehta’s biopic on Raja Ravi Verma titled ‘Rang Rasiya’.

So influenced was Phalke by Ravi Verma’s paintings, that much like the painter brought to life the images of gods on his canvas, Phalke was determined to bring them alive on screen. 

Even though Phalke’s initial films met with tremendous success, he became disillusioned after his partnership in The Hindustan Film Company with some businessmen went sour. He gave up film making, went and settled in Benares for a while, suffered personal losses and experienced desperate times. He then wrote a play ‘Rangbhoomi’ and in connection with that when he came to Bombay, he was once again called by the Hindustan Film Company and this time there was no interference in his creative freedom. Phalke then went on to make several films in the second phase of his career till sound came to films and Talkies were born. He then retired and settled in Nasik.

Award constituted in his name:

Dadasaheb Phalke Award- It is the highest award of Indian Cinema. This award was introduced by the Government of India in 1969 to commemorate Dadasaheb Phalke’s contribution to Indian cinema. It is presented annually at the National Film Awards ceremony by the Directorate of Film Festivals, an organisation set up by the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting. The recipient is honoured for his/her “outstanding contribution to the growth and development of Indian cinema” and is selected by a committee consisting of eminent personalities from the Indian film industry. The award comprises a Swarna Kamal (Golden Lotus) medallion, a shawl, and a cash prize of ₹1,000,000.

The first recipient of the prestigious award, actress Devika Rani, often referred to as the First Lady of Indian Cinema was honoured at the 17th National Film Awards. The latest recipient of this honour has been writer-actor-director Manoj Kumar (2015).

Farewell :

phalke3The founding father of our cinema did not get the distinction he deserved during his lifetime and passed away in 1944 much before our country became independent. Today there are awards constituted in his name and the recipients of the award take home large cash prizes. An yet it is with a heavy heart we realize that the very man who pioneered this gigantic film industry of ours spent his last few years in misery and died almost unnoticed far away from the industry in Nasik with hardly a handful of people attending his funeral…

Such is the irony of life and the game of showbiz…

I am reminded of Raj Kapoor’s song form Mera Naam Joker:

…Kal khel mein hum ho na ho, gardish mein taare rahenge sadaa

Bhuloge tum, Bhulenge woh, par hum tumhare rahenge sadaa

Rahenge yaheen apne nishaan, iske sivaa jaana kahan…

(English meaning: …Tomorrow when I am gone, stars will continue to shine in the firmament. You may forget me and they may forget me, but I shall always remain yours, for I have left my footprints in this very place for eternity…)

NIL BATTEY SANNATA: An endearing piece of cinema

By

Sharada Iyer

 nil-battey-sannata-3

‘Nil Battey Sannata’ is a phrase commonly used in Uttar Pradesh to signify ‘good-for-nothing’ or ‘useless’. Debutante director Ashwiny Iyer Tiwari chooses this quirky but catchy title for her recently released film which is set in the by-lanes of Agra, UP, and traces the heart-warming journey of a mother-daughter duo. The film has several motifs of life intricately woven into the narrative like the power of the ‘never-say-die’ spirit in a human being to overcome obstacles, the travails of a lower-middle class mother to accomplish her goal, the psychology and attitude of a 15-year old girl under the depicted circumstances and the changing moods of the mother-daughter bond during the course of the film.

The mother played by actress Swara Bhaskar is the central character in the film and works as a maid in a doctor’s house (Ratna Pathak Shah plays the doctor) and the two of them share a very warm relationship. Swara discusses her problems, her dreams, her fears as well as her apprehensions with her mistress who in turn not only lends her a patient ear but also comes up with ideas to solve her dilemmas.  Swara’s biggest worry is her daughter who has just entered the tenth standard and has no interest in studies. Her phobia for Mathematics seems incurable and results in her failing the subject with remarkable regularity.

 nbs1In a country like ours which gives so much importance to the tenth standard Board Exams, this final year of school becomes a do-or-die year for many children, especially the ones belonging to the lower strata of our society and the marks they secure in these exams can actually make or break their careers.

The film is a beautiful lesson in hope and positivity and reiterates the fact that irrespective of age, gender or status, we can dare to dream and it is up to us to follow that dream with passion and dedication and write our own destiny.

The setting of the film as well as all the characters, the dialogues and the lingo used are very natural and the performances are top-notch.  Swara Bhaskar who just three years back played the troubled daughter in the film ‘Listen Amaya…’ is simply brilliant as the troubled mother in this film. In an interview she had mentioned that to prepare for the character, she went and stayed with the maids in Agra and spent time with them observing their body language, their lingo and picked up those little nuances which have indeed helped her come up with a memorable performance.

swara2_1458649965_725x725 (1)

Riya Shukla as the daughter is a complete natural and conveys the angst and joys of the adolescent girls of that age with amazing understanding and depth and is a treat to watch. Ratna Pathak fits into any character so beautifully. Just last month she had come up with a superb performance in ‘Kapoor and Sons’ and in this film also she manages to leave her mark in a short but sweet role. Pankaj Tripathi as the humorous principal-cum-maths teacher of the school is superb. It is difficult to imagine this actor who has played such villainous roles in films like ‘Gangs of Wasseypur’, ‘Manjhi-The Mountain Man’, etc., in such a delightful role. His scenes in the movie have a lot of humour.

Once in a while our industry comes up with charming ‘feel-good’ films (‘Iqbal’ and ‘Dum Lagake Haisha’ are two recent examples) which may seem simple in terms of budget and star-cast but leave a great impression with their uplifting narrative, natural performances and powerful story-telling. ‘Nil Battey Sannata’ is definitely one of them and promises to bring a smile on your face and a satisfaction in your heart when you leave the cinema hall.

Posting a link to the trailer of this lovely film…hope this makes you all want to see the film…   

FAN: The Dawn of a New Innings for Shah Rukh Khan!

By

Sharada Iyer

I must say I was completely and unabashedly bowled over by the brilliant performance of Shah Rukh Khan in his dual avatar in the recently released ‘FAN’. The movie itself was very engrossing from start to finish with a taut script, racy narrative and no deviations from the central plot. On top of it there are no songs!!! Even the catchy song released as a teaser-‘Jabra fan ho gayaa…’ was only for the You Tube promotions. It is not part of the film. Indeed the film showcases two SRKs- both in an unusual light sans his popular romantic image, no star-heroine and as I mentioned no songs…

The film with an interesting plot of a superstar and his look-alike fan is basically a psychological thriller and hence may not appeal to SRK’s usual family audience but there is no doubt that he has shown tremendous guts in accepting such a project highlighting the negative shades in both the characters. True, SRK did attempt such characters in the beginning of his career like Darr, Baazigar, Anjaam and Hum Tumhare Hain Sanam but to have one Shah Rukh pitted against another throughout the film is a novel aspect. 

The story in a gist is about a fan who is obsessed with his favourite superstar and would go to any lengths to meet him and just spend five minutes with him. What he fails to realize is that he is only one among the countless fans spread all over the country with similar dreams and aspirations.  Ironically he not only resembles him in looks but also hails from a middle-class family in Delhi and wins a prize every year for the best act in a local ‘mela’ or fair by imitating him and all this makes him feel even closer to his idol.

But when destiny does bring him face to face with his idol, things go completely wrong and  this chance meeting turns out to be a complete antithesis of whatever he had dreamt of. With the result, his attitude takes a 180 degree turn and he now hates the very man who had possessed him mentally and emotionally all these years.

 

fan2

Thus starts a cat-and-mouse game between the two with unexpected twists and turns and thrilling chase sequences showing the extent to which a human mind can plot and plunge when desperation sets in. Revealing anything more of the plot would spoil the fun for those who have not yet seen…but it would suffice to say that in spite of a few loopholes, there is not a single boring moment.

Shah Rukh Khan brings out the complexities of both the characters beautifully but it is as the star- obsessed-fan that he steals your heart from the very first scene. The typical Punjabi-Delhi accent, his body language as that of a 25-year old Delhiite and his camaraderie with his parents are all superbly executed. In a country like ours obsessed with Bollywood stars, his maniacal obsession is very believable and the audience would be inclined to understand and empathize with him completely.    A special mention about the outstanding prosthetics and make-up used to create a younger looking SRK albeit with a difference in their jawline and hairstyle. This gives a very authentic touch to his whole get-up.

srk-fan-review

Shah Rukh as the superstar is also not an easy act to pull through. To play a character who for all practical purposes is modelled on his real life persona and exposes the vulnerable and not so-likeable aspects of any star in his/her real life requires gumption and to SRK’s credit, he has given it his all and come out in flying colours.

 fan5

As we leave the cinema hall, we cannot help but wonder as to how we as a nation are so obsessed with our stars and subconsciously feel a connection with them… the kind of joyful madness which makes people travel from different parts of the country, stand for hours in front of their house in a milling crowd just to get a glimpse of, or just a wave from their favourite star… and in the process derive so much pleasure…

…And do these stars, who work day in and day out to entertain us and capture our hearts and sell us dreams, really understand what it is to be a true and loyal fan? To quote the fan’s dialogue from the film where he tells the star – “Tum nahin samjhoge…” (You will never understand). Eventually both the star and the fan become victims of the images created on celluloid and are caught in a web of emotions of their own making.

It is immaterial whether the film rakes in rupees 100 crores in the first week or beats the record of his earlier films or is even termed a flop, it is a treat for SRK fans… and for those who are not his fans, all I can say is you are missing something…